Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews: Complete Guide for Microsoft 365 Administrators

One of the biggest security challenges in Microsoft 365 environments is ensuring that users retain only the access they actually need.

Over time, employees change departments, contractors complete projects, and guest users stop collaborating. Yet their permissions often remain untouched, creating unnecessary security risks.

Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews help organizations regularly verify user access and automatically remove permissions that are no longer required.

In this guide, you'll learn what Access Reviews are, how they work, their benefits, licensing requirements, and best practices for implementation.


What Are Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews?

Access Reviews are a feature within Microsoft Entra ID that enables organizations to periodically review and validate user access to resources.

Administrators can schedule reviews for:

  • Microsoft 365 Groups
  • Security Groups
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Enterprise Applications
  • Privileged Roles
  • Guest Users

The purpose is simple: Ensure users still require the access they currently have.


Why Access Reviews Matter

Many organizations grant permissions but rarely revisit them.

This often results in:

  • Permission Creep
  • Users accumulate permissions over time as they move between roles.

  • Forgotten Guest Accounts
  • External users continue accessing resources long after projects have ended.

  • Excessive Administrative Privileges
  • Privileged roles remain assigned even when no longer needed.

  • Compliance Risks
  • Organizations struggle to prove that access is regularly reviewed and validated.

Access Reviews address these issues through scheduled governance processes.


How Access Reviews Work

The review process typically follows these steps:

  • Step 1: Create a Review
  • An administrator creates an Access Review and selects:

    • Resource type
    • Reviewers
    • Review frequency
    • Review duration
  • Step 2: Reviewers Receive Notifications
  • Reviewers receive email notifications prompting them to review access assignments.

  • Step 3: Review Decisions Are Made
  • Reviewers can:

    • Approve access
    • Deny access
    • Leave recommendations unchanged
  • Step 4: Results Are Applied
  • After completion, Microsoft Entra can automatically:

    • Remove access
    • Disable guest accounts
    • Apply reviewer decisions

    This creates a fully automated governance process.


Resources That Can Be Reviewed

  • Microsoft Teams
  • Review team membership regularly to ensure only authorized users retain access.

  • Microsoft 365 Groups
  • Validate membership for collaboration groups.

  • Security Groups
  • Confirm access to security-sensitive resources.

  • Enterprise Applications
  • Ensure users still require access to SaaS applications.

  • Administrative Roles
  • Review assignments such as:

    • Global Administrator
    • Security Administrator
    • Exchange Administrator
    • User Administrator

Access Reviews for Guest Users

Guest user management is one of the most common use cases.

Organizations often collaborate with:

  • Vendors
  • Consultants
  • Partners
  • Contractors

After projects conclude, these accounts frequently remain active.

Access Reviews help identify:

  • Inactive guests
  • Unnecessary guests
  • Stale collaboration accounts

Organizations can then remove access automatically.

Example Scenario

A consulting company is granted access to a Microsoft Team for a six-month project.

At the end of the project:

  • An Access Review is triggered.
  • The project owner reviews guest access.
  • Unneeded accounts are removed automatically.

Access Reviews for Administrative Roles

Administrative accounts represent high-value targets for attackers.

Regular reviews help ensure:

  • Only authorized administrators retain elevated permissions.
  • Temporary assignments are removed.
  • Compliance requirements are satisfied.

This is particularly valuable when combined with Microsoft Entra PIM.


Access Reviews vs PIM

Many administrators confuse Access Reviews and Privileged Identity Management.

Access Reviews PIM
Reviews existing access Controls privileged access
Periodic validation Just-in-time access
Governance-focused Security-focused
Works across many resource types Primarily privileged roles and resources
Can remove unnecessary access Limits privilege exposure

Both solutions complement each other.


Benefits of Access Reviews

  • Improved Security
  • Removes unnecessary permissions before they become security risks.

  • Better Compliance
  • Supports audits and regulatory requirements.

  • Reduced Administrative Effort
  • Automates repetitive access validation tasks.

  • Stronger Governance
  • Provides visibility into who has access to critical resources.

  • Cleaner Microsoft 365 Environment
  • Eliminates stale accounts and unnecessary memberships.


Common Access Review Use Cases

  • Quarterly Guest User Reviews
  • Review all guest accounts every 90 days.

  • Administrative Role Certification
  • Validate privileged role assignments monthly.

  • Application Access Governance
  • Review access to sensitive business applications.

  • Project-Based Team Reviews
  • Ensure project teams only contain active participants.

  • Contractor Access Validation
  • Automatically remove access when contracts end.


Best Practices for Access Reviews

  • Start with Guest Users
  • Guest accounts often provide the quickest security improvements.

  • Review Privileged Roles Frequently
  • Monthly reviews are recommended for administrative accounts.

  • Enable Automatic Remediation
  • Automatically remove denied users whenever possible.

  • Use Business Owners as Reviewers
  • Resource owners usually understand access requirements better than IT administrators.

  • Combine with PIM
  • Use Access Reviews alongside Privileged Identity Management for maximum protection.


Licensing Requirements

Access Reviews generally require:

  • Microsoft Entra ID P2
  • Microsoft 365 E5
  • Enterprise Mobility + Security E5

Organizations should verify licensing requirements before deployment.


Frequently Asked Questions

  • Can Access Reviews automatically remove users?
  • Yes. Organizations can configure reviews to automatically apply reviewer decisions.

  • Can guest users review themselves?
  • Yes. Self-attestation reviews are supported for certain scenarios.

  • How often should Access Reviews run?
  • Most organizations schedule reviews monthly, quarterly, or semi-annually depending on resource sensitivity.

  • Do Access Reviews work with Microsoft Teams?
  • Yes. Teams membership can be reviewed through associated Microsoft 365 Groups.


Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Reviewing Too Many Resources at Once
  • Start with critical resources and expand gradually.

  • Ignoring Guest Users
  • Guest accounts often represent the largest governance gap.

  • Not Applying Review Results
  • Reviews are only valuable when decisions are enforced.

  • Using IT as the Sole Reviewer
  • Business owners are often better positioned to evaluate access needs.


Conclusion

Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews provide an effective way to maintain security, improve governance, and reduce compliance risks within Microsoft 365 environments. By regularly validating user access, organizations can eliminate permission creep, remove stale guest accounts, and ensure that only authorized users retain access to critical resources.

For organizations adopting Zero Trust principles and modern identity governance practices, Access Reviews should be considered an essential component of every Microsoft 365 security strategy.

Did You Know? Managing Microsoft 365 applications is even easier with automation. Try our Graph PowerShell scripts to automate tasks like generating reports, cleaning up inactive Teams, or assigning licenses efficiently.

Ready to get the most out of Microsoft 365 tools? Explore our free Microsoft 365 administration tools to simplify your administrative tasks and boost productivity.

© Your Site Name. All Rights Reserved. Design by HTML Codex